Bringing Our Lifestyle in Balance With Nature
Saturday, November 29th, 2008
This whole sustainability thing is in need of a major branding overhaul. When you let scientists and policymakers control the sustainability conversation you get definitions of sustainability such as “meeting present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.” Talk about boring. Talk about uninspiring.
We need leaders who understand that creating an inspiring environmental vision and appealing to enlightened self-interested are the most effective tools for getting those SUV driving, McMansion aspiring mainstream Americans excited about joining the green movement.
And let’s be clear: sustainability is a movement, a human-centric movement designed to enable humans to live on this planet for a long time. But a movement that only promotes the goal of being able to live here for a long time hardly seems much worth joining let alone fighting for. How about living in abundance? How about fostering a vibrant, dynamic society that furthers the human journey? How about living as well as we possibly can?
-
To that end, I propose a new definition of sustainability:To live as well as we possibly can while bringing our lifestyles into balance with nature.
-
Same goal. Only reframed in such a way that it might just generate some excitement.
This might all sound like semantics but it’s hugely important. Unless the environmental movement examines its communication strategies, it will never attract the type of widespread acceptance necessary to be effective on the scale required to solve the enormous environmental challenges we face.
It’s time to recognize that there is an overwhelming opportunity to frame green choices in terms of personal self-interest environmentalism. The new green value proposition should be: it’s better for you AND for the planet.
-
Source: The Lazy Environmentalist

